About rameumptom

Gerald (Rameumptom) Smith is a student of the gospel. Joining the Church of Jesus Christ when he was 16, he served a mission in Santa Cruz Bolivia (1978=1980). He is married to Ramona, has 3 stepchildren and 7 grandchildren. Retired Air Force (Aim High!). He has been on the Internet since 1986 when only colleges and military were online. Gerald has defended the gospel since the 1980s, and was on the first Latter-Day Saint email lists, including the late Bill Hamblin's Morm-Ant. Gerald has worked with FairMormon, More Good Foundation, LDS.Net and other pro-LDS online groups. He has blogged on the scriptures for over a decade at his site: Joel's Monastery (joelsmonastery.blogspot.com). He has the following degrees: AAS Computer Management, BS Resource Mgmt, MA Teaching/History. Gerald was the leader for the Tuskegee Alabama group, prior to it becoming a branch. He opened the door for missionary work to African Americans in Montgomery Alabama in the 1980s. He's served in two bishoprics, stake clerk, high council, HP group leader and several other callings over the years. While on his mission, he served as a counselor in a branch Relief Society presidency.

Italy finally gets how to do austerity right

CATO notes that austerity measures in Europe have not worked up to this point, but caused a deeper recession.  The reason?  The austerity measures have been against private business and investment.  For example a tax increase on first time home buyers implemented in Italy has simply slowed down spending and investment.

So, now Italy recognizes that they need to cut spending by the government. Their new austerity package mostly focuses on cutting their government by several billions of Euros.

Here in the USA, we have also found that austere impositions against the private sector just slows down the economy.  Threat of punishment, more taxation, or regulation keeps businesses from expanding.  Such also keeps over $2 Trillion of money overseas.  Why did Apple pay less than 10% tax? By moving lots of its money overseas in legal loopholes.

Reality is, Medicare and Social Security are going bankrupt.  It is easier to fix them now, rather than wait until they go over the brink. Do we tell 80 year olds now that they cannot have a hip replacement, or do we tell their grandchildren that we cannot afford to deliver a baby or perform a life saving operation on a young person later?

Spending more money has not fixed the economy. As insistent as Paul Krugman is, the world is not going to forever lend us money to spend on everything and anything. Of course, he possibly gave the same advice to Enron. And his advice of borrowing more and more, and entering into greater and greater debt worked until everyone found out that the Emperor had no clothes, and the collapse came swiftly afterward.

It is time we return to small government and free markets.  Let’s insist our Congress and President go in this direction, or replace them.

CATO article

What can $5 Trillion buy?

President Obama is now the $5 Trillion Man.  $5 Trillion in deficit spending in just over 3 years.  It took our nation from George Washington through Bill Clinton to hit our first $5 Trillion in debt. It took George W Bush 8 years to add just under $5 Trillion to our deficit.  Pres Obama is the clear record holder. And if re-elected, his proposed budgets would have him deficit spending as much (or more) than all previous presidents combined.

So, just what can one buy with $5 Trillion?

  • Pay off half of all mortgages in the United States
  • Give 100 Million people $50,000 each
  • Offer all small businesses that you will pay the salaries of 2 new workers each (total of 12 million new jobs) up to $50K each for the next 8 years.
  • Buy 20 Million American made automobiles for $25K each
  • Two years of all health expenditures in the United States

What other things can $5 Trillion buy?

 

The Masculinization of Women

Rebecca Rickett has a very interesting article in the new Square Two publication ( http://squaretwo.org/Sq2ArticleRickettGender.html ) regarding how society is forcing women towards androgyny. (and if I misrepresent what she’s written, I apologize in advance).

She suggests that the current feminist movement is wrong in the methods used to achieve good goals. Unintentionally, they seek to make women into men, which they can never really succeed at becoming.  We are not talking about women getting equal pay for equal work, but at the concept that women’s natural capabilities (reproduction, etc) are viewed negatively, while the competitive nature of men in business is now what is expected of liberated women.

The disdain that many have towards natural gender differences has been a major cause of shrinking birth rates in industrialized nations, as women hold off on having children until they are older (or never have them), seeing it as a hidden tax on their ability to be like men.

A secondary problem is that it confuses gender roles for men and children as well.  Having more competition, men must either become more masculine in order to compete against androgynous women, or more feminine in order to find a less competitive place that many women have walked away from. Neither of which is beneficial to society nor the norms of gender.

There are ways for women to have greater rights and responsibilities. However, Rickett notes that it is not by making men out of women, nor is it by confusing roles.  She compares it to a race among three nations, where the winning group has both men and women running as best each can, and carrying the weak along with them.
Continue reading