About rameumptom

Gerald (Rameumptom) Smith is a student of the gospel. Joining the Church of Jesus Christ when he was 16, he served a mission in Santa Cruz Bolivia (1978=1980). He is married to Ramona, has 3 stepchildren and 7 grandchildren. Retired Air Force (Aim High!). He has been on the Internet since 1986 when only colleges and military were online. Gerald has defended the gospel since the 1980s, and was on the first Latter-Day Saint email lists, including the late Bill Hamblin's Morm-Ant. Gerald has worked with FairMormon, More Good Foundation, LDS.Net and other pro-LDS online groups. He has blogged on the scriptures for over a decade at his site: Joel's Monastery (joelsmonastery.blogspot.com). He has the following degrees: AAS Computer Management, BS Resource Mgmt, MA Teaching/History. Gerald was the leader for the Tuskegee Alabama group, prior to it becoming a branch. He opened the door for missionary work to African Americans in Montgomery Alabama in the 1980s. He's served in two bishoprics, stake clerk, high council, HP group leader and several other callings over the years. While on his mission, he served as a counselor in a branch Relief Society presidency.

Women don’t want to be condescended to….

Campbell Brown writes an excellent article in the NY Times Sunday edition – “Obama: Stop Condescending to Women”

In the article, she notes that Pres Obama is trying to court women voters (especially college age) by  suggesting that abortion and free contraceptive rights are highly important to all women. What does Brown think of the Life of Julia ads?

“Mr. Obama’s Web ad, “The Life of Julia,” a silly and embarrassing caricature based on the assumption that women look to government at every meaningful phase of their lives for help.”

Brown states that her female friends who are unemployed are looking first to family and friends for assistance and they “wouldn’t have it any other way.”

What concerns women, especially young college grad women?  Jobs. Economy. Being able to have a fair shake and opportunity.  They don’t want to have Pres Obama condescend to them with a bunch of gibberish that means little to them.  He risks insulting their intelligence when he claims that all women are smarter than men.

She notes: “It’s all so tired, the kind of fake praise showered upon those one views as easy to impress.”

Sadly, I see this coming from many politicians, more often from the left.  They will gladly spend billions of dollars on a program that shows little or no real change for the better, but because they’ve spent the money, they feel better about themselves.  We see this in education (how they fight opening schools up to market forces), balancing the budget without touching Medicare and other holy and sacred untouchable programs, and offering bribes to the American people and each other so they can get reelected.

Pres Obama (and Congress), quit talking down to women. And while you are at it, quit talking down to the rest of us as well!

 

Do Gays really want Marriage?

An article at National Review brings out some interesting statistics here in the USA and other countries that have long had civil unions/marriages for homosexuals: First, very few homosexuals are actually getting married here or elsewhere.  Second, in Norway and elsewhere, gay men have a 50% greater divorce rate than heterosexuals. Third, in Norway, lesbians have an astonishing 167% higher divorce rate than heterosexuals, while it is very high in other nations (partially due to the fact that women in all relationships tend to file for divorce more often).

These stats suggest that the importance of marriage really is not reflected in the homosexual community overall.  To grant them equal consideration may actually diminish the importance of the marriage covenant, turning it ever more into just another “right” that has no personal responsibility connected to it.

Perhaps it is time to refocus marriage on what made it important in the first place: progeny, covenant, til death do you part (or all eternity, if LDS).

Giving marriage to another group that does not really seem to take it as serious as it needs to be, seems like the perfect way to destroy its real meaning.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/299944/gay-divorcees-charles-c-w-cooke#

End of USA coal burning plants

Note the Scientific American article stating that regulations from EPA will effectively end the development of new coal-fired plants and eventually force current ones out of business.  Hey, we can replace them with cheap oil, right?  I mean, coal only manages 23% of our nation’s fuel/energy.

The good news is that we’ll be able to export all of that coal to other nations to pollute the atmosphere with, while our energy production goes down, and gas/oil prices jump up to replace coal. And of course, we’ll have to get more of that oil elsewhere, because we aren’t allowed to pump/refine it here. And the transportation of oil to USA, and transportation of coal elsewhere will also add to cost and pollution.

So, who wins?

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-end-of-coal-burning-in-the-us

Why the Church doesn’t have creeds or dogmas.

Recently, someone asked me why the Church does not have a set of specific doctrines to neatly create a broad theology and foundation for all we believe. Why don’t we have an established theology, developed by great philosopher-prophets like St Augustine, Origen, More or Aquinas?

In pondering it, I believe the LDS Church intentionally does not have a set theology, but only a few core doctrines, leaving room for  lots of personal revelation for individuals to seek God for themselves.  While Mormons do not have a specific theology, some Mormons DO theology. Check out saltpress.org as an example of this.  There are LDS philosophers, BTW.  James Faulconer, Joseph Spencer, Adam Miller, Blake Ostler, Clark Goble and others are excellent philosophers.  You can find many of them blogging about philosophy and the Church, as well as articles and books from several of them (like at saltpress.org).

The real problem isn’t philosophy, but philosophy that becomes doctrine or dogma.  When we establish creeds that are imperfect, then we close off the heavens and refuse to let them shower new revelation down upon us.  So the “philosophies of men, mingled with scripture” becomes bad when we establish such as dogma, rather than keep it as theory.  For the full gospel to be revealed, it requires that we keep an open mind to the things God wishes to reveal to us. It is possible that some LDS dogma of the past (Curse of Cain, etc) may have kept our members and leaders from receiving revelation on the priesthood until 1978, when most members were ready to hear and receive such a revelation and negate the wrong dogmatic claims made for over a century.

We’ll remember that the Lord told Joseph Smith not to join any other churches, because their creeds were an abomination to Him. Why were they an abomination, when most of us would agree with at least some/many aspects of the creeds?  Because, even if mostly true, they closed off the heavens to mankind, keeping them from receiving purer and more correct truths from heaven.

So, philosophy is not necessarily bad.  Doing theology isn’t necessarily bad.  Creating creeds and dogmas IS bad, as it nails the coffin shut on receiving any new light.