About rameumptom

Gerald (Rameumptom) Smith is a student of the gospel. Joining the Church of Jesus Christ when he was 16, he served a mission in Santa Cruz Bolivia (1978=1980). He is married to Ramona, has 3 stepchildren and 7 grandchildren. Retired Air Force (Aim High!). He has been on the Internet since 1986 when only colleges and military were online. Gerald has defended the gospel since the 1980s, and was on the first Latter-Day Saint email lists, including the late Bill Hamblin's Morm-Ant. Gerald has worked with FairMormon, More Good Foundation, LDS.Net and other pro-LDS online groups. He has blogged on the scriptures for over a decade at his site: Joel's Monastery (joelsmonastery.blogspot.com). He has the following degrees: AAS Computer Management, BS Resource Mgmt, MA Teaching/History. Gerald was the leader for the Tuskegee Alabama group, prior to it becoming a branch. He opened the door for missionary work to African Americans in Montgomery Alabama in the 1980s. He's served in two bishoprics, stake clerk, high council, HP group leader and several other callings over the years. While on his mission, he served as a counselor in a branch Relief Society presidency.

Occupy Wall Street – occupied by upper middle class?

An interesting article in the Atlantic on the status of many of those involved in Occupy Wall Street.  We aren’t talking about truck drivers, nurses, or those working at McDonald’s, but about those in the lower part of the upper middle class who suddenly bumped up against a glass ceiling, and have chosen to blame Wall Street bankers over the entire fiasco.  Never mind that these same people went ahead and bought houses they could not afford, or that went to Ivy League schools on student loans that their not-for-profit dream jobs could not pay back.

Remember hearing about the day (“way back when”) when our parents had to start at the bottom and work their way up?  They rented for years until they could afford a good down payment on a modest house they could afford?  They sent their kids to state college, because they couldn’t afford Ivy League?

Anyway, here is a realist among the liberals who does not share the frustration of the OWS crowd, because she pulled herself up with her own bootstraps.

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/10/the-rage-of-the-almost-elite/247638/

While all of America has a reason to be upset with the big banks and Congress for destroying our economy, do you think it reasonable that the people described in the article should be the ones on the front lines demanding their student loans be paid off?

Methods for improving testimony meetings

On another blog (BCC) a recent post suggested a method for having more Christ centered testimony meetings.

I would recommend another possible method that can be used for all Sacrament meetings:

Those sitting in the front row are given small signs with the numbers 1-10 on them. Those on the front row will then rate the testimony or talk, changing their numbers up/down as the testimony or talk continues.  Since the raters are on the front row, only those on the stand will be able to see if a person is receiving good scores or not, preventing any undue embarrassment.  This will strongly encourage members to step up the quality of their discourses.

A second benefit to this idea is that members will begin coming early and clamoring to get to the front pew first, versus the current action of arriving late and taking the back seat.

Any other methods you would like to see implemented to improve the quality of Church meetings?


					

Death of Qaddafi

While it always seems good to see the death of a tyrant, it does bring up some questions for me:

1. Do we really have the right to enter into another nation and topple its leaders without a clear US need to do so?

2. Why do we choose to topple a tyrant like Qaddafi, and not topple tyrants in Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Yemen, Pakistan, Venezuela, Bolivia, etc?

3. Who is to decide which nation’s leader is a tyrant or not?

4. If we break a nation, must we really have to fix it?  And if so, then why are we leaving Afghanistan while it is still broken?

5. Is it okay for a president to send in troops or engage in combat activities for longer than 90 days without Congress’ specific approval? (when does “days, not weeks” turn into months or years?)

6. Do we get involved in pushing the winners to choose someone to our own liking?  Or do we allow them to develop their own government, risking them developing a radical government, or a corrupt one (like Hamid Karzai’s Afghan government)?

7. Should we be spending billions of dollars on foreign wars when our own nation is drowning in trillions of dollars of debt?

8. Do you feel Barack Obama has earned his Nobel Prize for Peace? (I would ask about Bush, but they never offered him one)