About rameumptom

Gerald (Rameumptom) Smith is a student of the gospel. Joining the Church of Jesus Christ when he was 16, he served a mission in Santa Cruz Bolivia (1978=1980). He is married to Ramona, has 3 stepchildren and 7 grandchildren. Retired Air Force (Aim High!). He has been on the Internet since 1986 when only colleges and military were online. Gerald has defended the gospel since the 1980s, and was on the first Latter-Day Saint email lists, including the late Bill Hamblin's Morm-Ant. Gerald has worked with FairMormon, More Good Foundation, LDS.Net and other pro-LDS online groups. He has blogged on the scriptures for over a decade at his site: Joel's Monastery (joelsmonastery.blogspot.com). He has the following degrees: AAS Computer Management, BS Resource Mgmt, MA Teaching/History. Gerald was the leader for the Tuskegee Alabama group, prior to it becoming a branch. He opened the door for missionary work to African Americans in Montgomery Alabama in the 1980s. He's served in two bishoprics, stake clerk, high council, HP group leader and several other callings over the years. While on his mission, he served as a counselor in a branch Relief Society presidency.

Good To Great and how it applies to us

In 2001, Jim Collins and his team wrote a book, entitled “Good to Great.”

They gathered tons of data to determine what made companies truly great, and not just good or mediocre. Scanning through the stock market records, they sought out companies from 1950 to present that had a long period of okay performance, but then had a major increase in profits and stock  value lasting at least 15 years. Of the thousands of stocks, they only found 11 companies that fit their criteria.  Then, they searched those companies (comparing them with each other and contrasting them with others in their business sectors) to find out what made them different.

Over a few posts, I’ll share some of the key concepts, and then discuss them not in a business sense, but in a LDS setting. Continue reading

The ancient rite of kingship

In his wonderful book, “Old Testament Theology”, Gerhard Von Rad notes this about the ascension of David and Solomon to the throne after centuries of judges.

I. David’s thhrone did indeed very soon receive direct sacral legitimation, in the prophecy of Nathan (II Sam VII). Not only have recent investigations revealed a very 0ld kernel in this tradition, namely vss. 1-7, 11b, 16, 18-21, 25-29, but form-critical comparison has also established striking similarities to the Egyptian royal record. From the incidental remark “sitting in his palace” Continue reading

In Memory of the Truly Fallen

John Gee is an Egyptologist and expert on ancient things.  He can be pretty good in his field at times, and share those insights on his blog.  But this weekend, he drifted far afield of his area of expertise in ruminating on his memorializing a list of those “fallen”.  None of his group are dead, at least not in the sense of having departed this life.  Of this I’m rather certain, since I read Daniel Peterson’s blog all the time.  Instead, he has a list of “fallen” those that were once at the top of BYU’s power elite, who have fallen from grace over the last year.

Reality has it that few stay on top for very long.  Even though Daniel Peterson and others now drift around in a form of persona non grata with the Maxwell Institute, they still have lots of power and persuasion in their own fields and among LDS.

My post here regards two issues with Gee’s post.  First, it is time to stop beating a dead horse.  John, you are no longer a front runner in the Maxwell Institute. Get over it and move on.

Second, and this is my more important issue: I’m saddened and shocked that he would memorialize such a group, rather than the truly fallen, on Memorial Day. That Daniel Peterson and others have been affected by choices at BYU is well known now.  To compare them with the truly fallen is an outrage.  These people still collect paychecks. These people still go home each night to their families. I still read on Daniel’s blog of him attending concerts and traveling.  There is very little that has changed in the world because of the changes last year. The gospel is still true, and there will continue to be blogs, FAIR and Mormon Interpreter, etc., to feed the egos of those that may still feel sleighted.
Continue reading

Chewed Gum and Charity

Recently Elizabeth Smart noted that one thing that kept her from escaping her tormenters was a comment taught her by a teacher.  The teacher noted that women were like a piece of gum. When they lost their virginity, they ended up like a piece of chewed gum that no one would ever want.  Having been violated, she felt no one would want her, and so did not cry out when she heard rescuers near by.

I am very glad she made such a statement, to help young women realize they are not pieces of gum, who are only useful if they stay in their wrapper, never to be used; and then once used, only good to be tossed out.  Instead, they are like a gold coin. No matter how scratched or dirty it may become, it is still worth its weight in gold.

That said, some bloggers and Facebook posters have tried using her statements to attack the scriptures (notably Moroni 9) and some General Authorities, including President Elaine Dalton for statements regarding the importance of virtue and chastity.

I would like to comment on these.  First off, it is sad that some would take a quality and qualified statement by Elizabeth Smart, and twist her meaning to fit their own agendas (not all bloggers have done this, but several have).

Second, we all need to stop a moment, put the politics behind us, and consider something of equal importance in all of this: the concept of charity.  I would hope no one would take my words out of context.  I frequently see certain people raging against the machine, whether scripture or church leaders, simply because of a statement that goes against their own grain.

I would suggest we grant that ancient writer, or the modern speaker, a little bit of charity.  Are we understanding them in the way they want to be understood?  Are we seeking to understand and not misunderstand? Are we uncharitably seeking a political advantage by creating a crisis, where none need be?  Are we seeking to find a reason to leave the Church, being offended by an ill-chosen word?

I can understand people struggling with Moroni 9:9’s view of chastity. However, have we thought charitably about a few things? First, Mormon lived in a different world than us.  Second, did Mormon originally use the word “chastity”, or was it a word ill-chosen by the near illiterate Joseph Smith (in whose time, the Victorian era, chastity and virtue were very important)?  Is there a more profitable way for us to read it?  I recall Moroni fearing in Ether 12 that Gentiles would mock the words of the Book of Mormon.  The Lord stated that those with charity would embrace them and use them properly.  Mormon and Moroni risked their lives and toiled for decades to provide us with the Book of Mormon.  Such was their charity for us.  Should we not provide them with equal consideration?

The same goes with our modern leaders today. I do not think for a moment that Elaine Dalton considers any young woman to be a chewed up piece of gum, regardless of what some posters have intimated.  Can we not show charity to the church leaders, even as we seek forgiveness and charity from God?

Perhaps the day will come when we will stand at the judgment bar with Moroni (Moro 10), and the Lord will ask us what we’ve done with the Book of Mormon and the living oracles.  Will we be found with charity in that day?  Or will our politicking and digging a pit for others destroy us?

NBA’s Jason Collins and SCOTUS

John Shroder at the Article 6 Blog discusses protected groups of people.  There are two groups, those who do not have a choice (physical gender, age, race) and those who have a choice (religion, veteran, family status).

SCOTUS is seeing two cases this year on Same Gender Attraction issues, and Shroder notes that the recent coming out of the closet of Jason Collins (NBA center for the Mavericks) throws an interesting light into the subject.

Gays insist that they are born with their same sex attraction. I will not dispute that this may very well be for some gays. However, Jason Collins makes for an important issue: he is an identical twin. Continue reading