In a recent comment on the Ten Commandments of Speaking of Church, Jim told us about an experiment he once performed with Sacrament Meeting Talks:
For about 1 year, I kept a record of the talks in Sacrament Meeting. I organized each talk into one of three categories – A ) talks that explicitly mentioned the Savior, B ) talks that included some indirect reference to the Savior, and C ) talks that did not mention the Savior at all (except for the obligatory “in the name of…” at the end).
I don’t remember the final numbers, but proportionally, the talks for each category (A:B:C) fell out something like 1:5:4 – and that included monthly testimonies by Bishopric members, ward conference, high councilors, etc.
I never shared my survey with anyone at the time – it was only for my own amusement, since I wasn’t getting much else out of the talks at the time).
Still, I think the results show at least one reason why I wasn’t getting much out of the talks.
Jim’s post gave me an idea. I’d like to repeat and extend Jim’s experiment, but this time, harness the power of the bloggernacle to do it.
Continue reading →