In Search of the Real Joseph Smith

Joseph compare

[Original painting of Joseph Smith circa 1842 and digital alteration of painted HPH copy]

The November-December 1980 issue of Sunstone contained an article by Lorie Winder examining the physical descriptions and depictions of Joseph Smith. Though physical characteristics tell us little about the man himself, I understand why she titled her article In Search of the Real Joseph Smith.

I have frequently used the forward facing oil painting created in 1842 by an unknown artist in my posts about Joseph Smith. This is a painting that was owned by Joseph Smith III and is now owned by the Community of Christ. But this image is incorrect in various ways when compared to Joseph’s death mask:

  1. The eyes are too small and too close to the center of the face.
  2. The mouth is too small and too close to the nose.
  3. The chin is too close to the nose and gives the appearance of a concave face, where Joseph had a convex face.
  4. The nose itself is too narrow and the tip is far too pointy.

When corresponding with someone recently about the advanced review copy of my Reluctant Polygamist book, I asked about using the picture on the cover of the book. According to one theory of copyright, the image is in the public domain because it is a work published before January 1, 1923 and it is anonymous or pseudonymous due to unknown authorship. Thus it is in the public domain in the United States as well as countries and areas where the copyright terms of anonymous or pseudonymous works are 92 years or less since publication. However the image could still be restricted.

My friend wrote and said that isn’t their favorite version of the painting anyway. They then forwarded a photograph of another version of the painting. I presume it is a copy because there is writing in the top left corner that appears to say “Cop[yright] HPH” as shown here:

Joseph signature

This version of the painting shows Joseph in a blue jacket, which matches other images of Joseph created during his lifetime, such as this lithograph by Sutcliffe Maudsley showing Hyrum and Joseph Smith:

The eyes in HPH painting are blue as reported by various accounts included in Lorie Winder’s article, rather than the dark blue/hazel in the Joseph Smith III copy of the painting.

I suspect the “H P H” inscribed on this painting refers to Herald Publishing House, making this most likely a painted reproduction of the Joseph Smith III painting produced by the publishing arm of the RLDS Church necessarily after 1860, but likely during the lifetime of Emma Smith (d. Apr 1879). Input from Emma Smith could explain certain differences between the original and the copy (eye color, coat color). I do not know how many painted reproductions were created.

It seems the “daguerreotype” of Joseph Smith created by W. B. Carson circa 1879 is a picture of one of these painted copies, a copy “cropped” or painted to eliminate the background. Carson’s studio was in Peoria, Illinois, a mere 100 miles east of Nauvoo (and 100 miles southwest from Plano, Illinois, where the Herald Publishing House press was located at the time). The Library of Congress copy of the daguerreotype along with their descriptive data is below:

  • Joseph Smith / photo, W.B. Carson, Peoria, Ill.
  • Creator(s): Carson, W. B., photographer
  • Date Created/Published: c1879.
  • Medium: 1 photographic print : albumen silver ; 6 x 4 in.
  • Summary: Portrait photo (copy of a drawing or painting) showing bust of, Mormon leader and prophet, Joseph Smith, facing forward.

A daguerreotype of the original painting could not have captured the details of Joseph’s black outfit in the original painting. The artist(s) undoubtedly meant well, but the cropping of the image makes Joseph look like his head is a brioche bun. The painted images do not properly reflect the detail of why Joseph combed his hair forward on the sides, which I understand was the lack of hair on at least one side due to the mob attack of 1832 (a lack of hair on the side is seen in Mary Elizabeth Rollins Lightner’s watercolor of Joseph Smith, see Winder, In Search of the Real Joseph Smith, p. 33.)

“Correcting the Painting”

I am not aware if someone has attempted to use photoshop to “correct” a digital version of the original 1842 painting. But faced with the HPH copy, it seemed that even I could adjust the elements of the painting to match the death mask.

I used extremely simple digital methods to develop the update (Microsoft’s basic Paint program). The lips are fuller, though possibly not as full as the death mask. The eyes are wider with trusting pupils. The nose is also wider, giving a small hint of the nose arch seen in the death mask and the Sutcliffe Maudsley portraits. The result of my digital manipulations of the HPH copy are shown at the beginning of this post, next to the unmodified original painting.

It is interesting to note that the ways the original painting was “wrong” are features that lead people to have less trust. The narrow, small mouth, the narrow, tiny eyes, the thin nose, reminiscent of a fox or ferret.

Ironically, correcting the image to match the proportions of the death mask makes the result look more like the work of a “talented but untrained” individual, as the original artist has been characterized.

Every time I’ve posted something about images of Joseph Smith, folks have criticized me. Still, I see some value in attempting to use artifacts from before Joseph’s death to determine what he looked like in life.

This entry was posted in General by Meg Stout. Bookmark the permalink.

About Meg Stout

Meg Stout has been an active member of the Church of Jesus Christ (of Latter-day Saints) for decades. She lives in the DC area with her husband, Bryan, and several daughters. She is an engineer by vocation and a writer by avocation. Meg is the author of Reluctant Polygamist, laying out the possibility that Joseph taught the acceptability of plural marriage but may have privately defied the commandment for love of his wife, Emma.

8 thoughts on “In Search of the Real Joseph Smith

  1. About 30 years ago I met an artist in Provo who had painted his interpretation of Joseph based on the death mask. He claimed that past paintings based on the death mask were generally inaccurate because when someone is dead, their facial features sink back closer to the bones. As I recall, his painting of Joseph showed a slightly fuller face. I wish I could remember that artist’s name…

  2. If you look at the article, the correction to make the painting look like the death mask is not a matter of fullness or thinness. It’s a matter of physically where is the jaw, where are the lips, where is the nose, where is the brow. In her article it is estimated that the death mask was created about 24 hours after death, so those key points would not have been deformed significantly.

    Obviously the death mask through shows a thinner face then Joseph’s face would’ve been in life. Which is a reason for using a painting that we have every reason to believe was painted during his life as the basis.

  3. I’d like to know why Church correlation (or whoever decides these things) has declared recently that Joseph is to be portrayed as blond, even as an adult. It seems a bit strange to me, especially in those videos where he’s the only blond.

  4. Hi John,

    The blonde thing is probably because his descendent, Brian, happens to have blonde hair.

  5. Are there any direct male-line-descendants of JS living today?

    Did that one shift in the RLDS/CoC presidency mean that just -he- (the last CoC pres who was a descendant of JS) had no sons? Or that there were no more direct-male-line-descendants of JS in the CoC church? Or that there were no more dirct-male-line-descendents at all?

Comments are closed.