<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Give a Great Sacrament Meeting Talk &#8211; Part 0 of 5 (Introduction)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.millennialstar.org/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.millennialstar.org/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:51:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Wolfe</title>
		<link>http://www.millennialstar.org/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-30800</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Wolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 03:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millennialstar.org/2008/05/25/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/#comment-30800</guid>
		<description>Mark N. -

I admire Nibley, and count &quot;Approaching Zion&quot; as one of the most important books I&#039;ve read. But, on this, he&#039;s wrong.  

First off, he&#039;s conflating Aristotle with the Sophists.  Nibley seems to be taking an extreme form of Socrates&#039; disdain for the Sophists and putting it onto every practitioner of rhetoric ever (Even Socrates didn&#039;t have that dismal a view of rhetoric: in the Phaedrus, Socrates argued that rhetoric can be a good thing).

But Nibley also doesn&#039;t realize that every book he ever wrote used rhetoric.  Rhetoric is not some specialized realm of study - it&#039;s one of the few subjects that everyone makes use of pretty much all the time.  If Nibley ever tried to persuade (which he did), he engaged in rhetoric.  

Nibley was a smart man, but he clearly never truly studied what rhetoric was - instead he just took Socrates from &quot;Gorgias&quot; and took it to an extreme that even Socrates wouldn&#039;t recognize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark N. -</p>
<p>I admire Nibley, and count &#8220;Approaching Zion&#8221; as one of the most important books I&#8217;ve read. But, on this, he&#8217;s wrong.  </p>
<p>First off, he&#8217;s conflating Aristotle with the Sophists.  Nibley seems to be taking an extreme form of Socrates&#8217; disdain for the Sophists and putting it onto every practitioner of rhetoric ever (Even Socrates didn&#8217;t have that dismal a view of rhetoric: in the Phaedrus, Socrates argued that rhetoric can be a good thing).</p>
<p>But Nibley also doesn&#8217;t realize that every book he ever wrote used rhetoric.  Rhetoric is not some specialized realm of study &#8211; it&#8217;s one of the few subjects that everyone makes use of pretty much all the time.  If Nibley ever tried to persuade (which he did), he engaged in rhetoric.  </p>
<p>Nibley was a smart man, but he clearly never truly studied what rhetoric was &#8211; instead he just took Socrates from &#8220;Gorgias&#8221; and took it to an extreme that even Socrates wouldn&#8217;t recognize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark N.</title>
		<link>http://www.millennialstar.org/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-30787</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millennialstar.org/2008/05/25/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/#comment-30787</guid>
		<description>Is this the right place to bring up Hugh Nibley&#039;s version of the definition of &quot;rhetoric&quot;?:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Aristotle defines it as the &quot;art of persuasion,&quot; the technical skill by which one convinces people — convinces, that is, everybody of anything for a fee, according to Clement of Alexandria. It is the training and skill by which one can make unimportant things seem important, according to Plato, or, to quote Clement again, &quot;make false opinions seem true by means of words.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the right place to bring up Hugh Nibley&#8217;s version of the definition of &#8220;rhetoric&#8221;?:</p>
<blockquote><p>Aristotle defines it as the &#8220;art of persuasion,&#8221; the technical skill by which one convinces people — convinces, that is, everybody of anything for a fee, according to Clement of Alexandria. It is the training and skill by which one can make unimportant things seem important, according to Plato, or, to quote Clement again, &#8220;make false opinions seem true by means of words.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floyd the Wonderdog</title>
		<link>http://www.millennialstar.org/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-30779</link>
		<dc:creator>Floyd the Wonderdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 11:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millennialstar.org/2008/05/25/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/#comment-30779</guid>
		<description>I no longer tell jokes in my talks. I am a naturally funny guy as anyone who has seen me can tell. (rim shot) One ward I was speaking in had an ASL interpreter sitting in front of the speaker to the right. He would interpret for the deaf members. I told a joke and he literally fell off his chair. I had to wait for him to regain his composure before I could continue. But even so, I can&#039;t avoid letting a little laugh in now and then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I no longer tell jokes in my talks. I am a naturally funny guy as anyone who has seen me can tell. (rim shot) One ward I was speaking in had an ASL interpreter sitting in front of the speaker to the right. He would interpret for the deaf members. I told a joke and he literally fell off his chair. I had to wait for him to regain his composure before I could continue. But even so, I can&#8217;t avoid letting a little laugh in now and then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saint Holiday</title>
		<link>http://www.millennialstar.org/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-30777</link>
		<dc:creator>Saint Holiday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 21:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millennialstar.org/2008/05/25/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/#comment-30777</guid>
		<description>Perhaps you might touch upon how we could employ the gifts of prophecy and tongues in our sermons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you might touch upon how we could employ the gifts of prophecy and tongues in our sermons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jedd</title>
		<link>http://www.millennialstar.org/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-30775</link>
		<dc:creator>Jedd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 23:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millennialstar.org/2008/05/25/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/#comment-30775</guid>
		<description>A while back, I submitted a Millenial Star guest post titled &quot;The 10 Commandments of Speaking in Church.&quot;  Here&#039;s the link:  http://www.millennialstar.org/2005/03/02/guest-post-the-ten-commandments-of-speaking-in-church/

(For some reason, some of the text is garbled.)

I&#039;d be interested in what points you agree or disagree with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while back, I submitted a Millenial Star guest post titled &#8220;The 10 Commandments of Speaking in Church.&#8221;  Here&#8217;s the link:  <a href="http://www.millennialstar.org/2005/03/02/guest-post-the-ten-commandments-of-speaking-in-church/" rel="nofollow">http://www.millennialstar.org/2005/03/02/guest-post-the-ten-commandments-of-speaking-in-church/</a></p>
<p>(For some reason, some of the text is garbled.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested in what points you agree or disagree with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Wolfe</title>
		<link>http://www.millennialstar.org/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-30774</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Wolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 21:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millennialstar.org/2008/05/25/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/#comment-30774</guid>
		<description>William Morris -

that will fit under &quot;style&quot; - so I&#039;ll get to it.

(interestingly, a large chunk of my dissertation deals with British writer, designer, and communist William Morris).

All-
Part one should go up tomorrow sometime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William Morris -</p>
<p>that will fit under &#8220;style&#8221; &#8211; so I&#8217;ll get to it.</p>
<p>(interestingly, a large chunk of my dissertation deals with British writer, designer, and communist William Morris).</p>
<p>All-<br />
Part one should go up tomorrow sometime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.millennialstar.org/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-30773</link>
		<dc:creator>William Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millennialstar.org/2008/05/25/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/#comment-30773</guid>
		<description>How about a post on what makes analogies, aphorisms, parables, metaphors, etc. compelling, useful and appropriate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a post on what makes analogies, aphorisms, parables, metaphors, etc. compelling, useful and appropriate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.millennialstar.org/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-30772</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 01:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millennialstar.org/2008/05/25/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/#comment-30772</guid>
		<description>I say that you should emphasize some of the basic mistakes people make (and how to avoid making them.)  I used to think that it was silly to keep saying that, e.g., a testimony is not a &quot;thankimony&quot; or a travel log or a detailed medical history, until I started listening more (and reading novels less) in Sacrament meeting.  Similarly, you can&#039;t say, for instance, &quot;don&#039;t start your talk with a humorous anecdote regarding your failure to avoid being given this assignment,&quot; frequently enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say that you should emphasize some of the basic mistakes people make (and how to avoid making them.)  I used to think that it was silly to keep saying that, e.g., a testimony is not a &#8220;thankimony&#8221; or a travel log or a detailed medical history, until I started listening more (and reading novels less) in Sacrament meeting.  Similarly, you can&#8217;t say, for instance, &#8220;don&#8217;t start your talk with a humorous anecdote regarding your failure to avoid being given this assignment,&#8221; frequently enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Wolfe</title>
		<link>http://www.millennialstar.org/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-30771</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Wolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millennialstar.org/2008/05/25/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/#comment-30771</guid>
		<description>Ray  (just missed you while writing my comment) -

exactly.  I might even quote part of your comment there later in the series.  

To all - I hope I get more feedback like this as the series progresses.  Great comments, all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray  (just missed you while writing my comment) -</p>
<p>exactly.  I might even quote part of your comment there later in the series.  </p>
<p>To all &#8211; I hope I get more feedback like this as the series progresses.  Great comments, all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Wolfe</title>
		<link>http://www.millennialstar.org/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-30770</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Wolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millennialstar.org/2008/05/25/how-to-give-a-great-sacrament-meeting-talk-part-0-of-5-introduction/#comment-30770</guid>
		<description>Bookslinger -
quibble noted, and I agree (I hope the series, as it progresses, will answer some of your concerns).  Part of this has to do with how &quot;persuasion&quot; is defined - and part 1 will, in part, tackle the problem of defining key terms.

Ardis -

well, there will be some examples.  Perhaps I&#039;ll add in a few more than I originally planned.

Geoff B -

originality is important, but it needs to be tempered (BiV notes this as well).  I&#039;ve seen some very &quot;original&quot; sacrament meeting talks that made me wish for a boring, dry speaker who would teach some easily understood principle.  On the other hand, there does need to be some creativity in the talk - we should give a talk that no one else could give.  The spirit may be speaking through us, but we aren&#039;t all automatons, and if we give speeches that anyone else could have given - well, I&#039;ll discuss that soon enough.

Floyd -

Noted.  I will stress that.  It&#039;s the most important part, after all.  Giving a good talk will allow the spirit in, but the spirit is more important than any oratorical power.

BiV - 
hopefully I&#039;ll have the whole series up before your June 13th deadline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bookslinger -<br />
quibble noted, and I agree (I hope the series, as it progresses, will answer some of your concerns).  Part of this has to do with how &#8220;persuasion&#8221; is defined &#8211; and part 1 will, in part, tackle the problem of defining key terms.</p>
<p>Ardis -</p>
<p>well, there will be some examples.  Perhaps I&#8217;ll add in a few more than I originally planned.</p>
<p>Geoff B -</p>
<p>originality is important, but it needs to be tempered (BiV notes this as well).  I&#8217;ve seen some very &#8220;original&#8221; sacrament meeting talks that made me wish for a boring, dry speaker who would teach some easily understood principle.  On the other hand, there does need to be some creativity in the talk &#8211; we should give a talk that no one else could give.  The spirit may be speaking through us, but we aren&#8217;t all automatons, and if we give speeches that anyone else could have given &#8211; well, I&#8217;ll discuss that soon enough.</p>
<p>Floyd -</p>
<p>Noted.  I will stress that.  It&#8217;s the most important part, after all.  Giving a good talk will allow the spirit in, but the spirit is more important than any oratorical power.</p>
<p>BiV &#8211;<br />
hopefully I&#8217;ll have the whole series up before your June 13th deadline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

