# Father’s Day Special: Relatedness of Abraham and the Children of Israel

In all that we hear about fathers, one of their most fundamental, axiomatic even, contributions to our lives is seldom mentioned on Father’s Day: Fathers are they who gave us half or more of our genetic composition. “Or more?” the reader may ask. I shall elaborate with special consideration of the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and the children of Israel.

A measure of the genetic similarity of two relatives is the coefficient of relatedness, which ranges from zero, for two completely unrelated individuals, to one, the relatedness of a person to herself. It can be thought of as either the fraction of genetic heritage that is shared by two people, or as the probability that a particular gene that one person possesses is also shared by her relative. The relatedness of a parent and child is 1/2, as is the relatedness of full-siblings. For half-siblings relatedness is 1/4. For aunts and uncles and their nephews and nieces, it’s also 1/4, and for first cousins, relatedness is 1/8. There’s a famous population genetics joke about this. “Would you give your life for your brother?” “No, but I would give my life for four nephews or for eight cousins.”

The relatedness of Abraham and his half-niece Sarah was 1/8. Consequently, the relatedness of each parent to their son Isaac was greater than 1/2. Sarah, besides being Isaac’s mother, was also his half-first cousin, and Abraham was the half-brother of Isaac’s maternal grandfather. At first glance, that web of ancestry would raise Isaac’s relatedness to both of this parents to 9/16; however, inbreeding attenuates the increase in relatedness. Being related to his parents through two paths made it possible for Isaac to inherit two copies of genes that Abraham and Sarah possessed singly, and that reduced his genetic similarity to his parents. The formula for calculating the coefficient of relatedness is:

Rxy = ∑ { (1/2)n+n’(1+Fa) } / √{ (1+Fx)(1+Fy) }.

Summation is over all lines of ancestry that link x and y to common ancestors, n is the number of generations between x and a common ancestor, and n’ is the number of generations between y and that ancestor. Fa, Fx, and Fy are the coefficients of inbreeding of the common ancestor and of the two relatives whose relatedness is being calculated. The coefficient of inbreeding is calculated as

Fx = ∑ { (1/2)n+n’+1(1+Fa) }.

For this formula, summation is over lines of ancestry to common ancestors of the individual’s father and mother, n is the number of generations from the individual’s father to a common ancestor, and n’ is the number of generations from the individual’s mother to that ancestor. The coefficient of inbreeding is the portion of a person’s genes that are identical by descent on both sets of chromosomes. The inbrededness for the children of married first cousins is 1/16 = 6.25%. Considering Isaac, Terah is his grandfather by Abraham and his great-grandfather by Sarah. That gives Isaac also an inbrededness of 1/16 = 6.25% and a relatedness to Abraham and Sarah of (1/2+1/16)/√(17/16) = 9/(4√17) = 55%.

Bethuel, father of Rebekah, had a pattern of ancestry symmetric to Isaac’s and was a double first cousin to Isaac; their fathers were brothers and their mothers were sisters. Isaac and Bethuel’s relatedness was 10/17 = 59%, closer than brothers. Consequently, calculation of relatedness between Isaac and Rebekah involves six lines of ancestry: from Haran (1) and from Mrs. Haran (2) by Sarah and by Milcah and Bethuel; from Terah (3) and from Mrs. Terah (4) by Abraham and by Nahor and Bethuel; and from Terah alone by Abraham and by Haran, Milcah and Bethuel (5) and also by Haran and Sarah and by Nahor and Bethuel (6). This makes the relatedness of Isaac and Rebekah (1/16 + 1/16 + 1/16 + 1/16 + 1/32 + 1/32)/√(17/16) = 5/(4√17) = 30%, intermediate to the relatedness of half-siblings and full-siblings. Their sons Jacob and Esau had an inbrededness of 5/64 = 7.8% and a relatedness to each other of 71/138 = 51%. Their relatedness to their father Isaac was 57% and to their mother Rebekah it was 56%. The relatedness of Jacob and Esau to Abraham, and also to Sarah, was 34.6%, compared to 25% for a standard grandparent-grandchild relationship.

That’s all for this Father’s Day. When I’ve time, I’ll wrap this up with a look at Leah and Rachel and their children, the original house of Israel, and give some references for further reading, including some mention of Sewell Wright.

This entry was posted in General by John Mansfield. Bookmark the permalink.

Mansfield in the desertA third-generation southern Nevadan, I have lived in exile most of my life in such places as Los Alamos, Baltimore, Los Angeles, the western suburbs of Detroit, and currently the northern suburbs of Washington, D.C. I work as a fluid dynamics engineer. I was baptized at age twelve in the font of the Las Vegas Nevada Central Stake Center, and on my nineteenth birthday I received the endowment in the St. George Temple. I served as a missionary mostly in the Patagonia of Argentina from 1985 to 1987. My true calling in the Church seems to be working with Cub Scouts, whom I have served in different capacities in four states most years since 1992. (My oldest boy turned eight in 2004.) I also currently teach Sunday School to the thirteen-year-olds. I hold degrees from two universities named for men who died in the 1870s, the Brigham Young University and the Johns Hopkins University. My wife is Elizabeth Pack Mansfield, who comes from New Mexico's north central mountains and studied molecular biology at the same two schools I attended. We have four sons, whose care and admonition, along with care of my aged father, require much of Elizabeth's time. She currently serves the Church as Mia-Maid advisor, ward music chairman, and choir director, and plays violin whenever she can. One day, I would like to make shoes.

## 2 thoughts on “Father’s Day Special: Relatedness of Abraham and the Children of Israel”

1. Hmmm, I wonder about the relatedness of the sons and daughters of Adam and Eve. Or the grandsons and granddaughters of Noah. Kind of icky when you stop to think about it.

2. I wonder what a study of the FLDS adherants would yield in terms of relatedness. 🙂