I might as well add my voice to the chorus of self-congratulatory and/or other-condemning posts out there on the topic (I won’t link to them, though. Well, I’ll link to this one, which is the only good one I’ve seen so far).
Orson Scott Card in his wonderful “Saintspeak” (which predates snarker sites by decades, and did it better than any of them – if any of them are still active) pretty much already came up with the definitive definitions: Continue reading
This news story reminded me of an old post, so I decided to “resurrect” the old post for current consumption:
This story seems to be making the rounds on the net (again – it first surfaced a few months ago, though I somehow missed it then).
The football committee of the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference, which governs high school sports, is adopting a “score management” policy that will suspend coaches whose teams win by more than 50 points.
This reminded me of two experiences in High School (one of which was a major life lesson to me), and got me thinking about the uses and abuses of competition. Continue reading
Peggy Fletcher Stack, has an article here about the “Not Even Once” controversy.
I’m not going to comment on the article as a whole (though it’s interesting that in the last few year, Ms. Stack seems to be using the more liberal wing of the bloggernacle for unpaid R&D). I do want to comment on one theologically ignorant statement:
Mormons “give constant lip service to Christ’s atonement, but our highest aspiration is never to come within a hundred feet of it,” Jones writes. “If only we can prevent people from performing wrong actions, we think, they can return safely to heaven, untouched by the world and I would add, untouched by Christ’s grace.”
This is wrong on many, many levels – but I’ll focus on just one.
Author: Margaret Blair Young and Darius Aidan Gray
Title: Standing on the Promises, Book Two: Bound for Canaan
Publisher: Zarahemla Press
Genre: Historical Fiction
Number of pages: 413
Cost: $18.95 Continue reading
I teach writing. In the past, when student write arguments on marriage, it’s usually the typical arguments for or against same sex marriage.
This year, I’ve had more than a handful of students write arguments that marriage, whether same sex or not, is discriminatory, because it gives exclusive benefits not available to non-married people. Marriage needs to go!
[Now, before you decide that this is a "see how the push for same-sex marriage is undermining marriage itself" post, please read on..] Continue reading