Home > Any > Proximity to the Temples of North America, Central America, Hawaii, and the Caribbean

Proximity to the Temples of North America, Central America, Hawaii, and the Caribbean

Range Map

The graphic above shows proximity to dedicated Latter-day Saint temples on thirteen dates from 1877 to 2006. For the first thirteen frames the colors indicate 150 nautical mile range bands: white, closer than 30 NM; green, between 30 and 150 NM; blue, between 150 and 300 NM; orange, between 300 and 450 NM; purple, between 450 and 600 NM; black, beyond 600 NM. The last five frames repeat dates from 1997 to 2006 with the colors indicating 50 nautical mile range bands: white, closer than 20 NM; green, between 20 and 50 NM; blue, between 50 and 100 NM; orange, between 100 and 150 NM; purple, between 150 and 200 NM; black, beyond 200 NM. Public domain data for coastlines and political boundaries were obtained from the USGS. The website LDSChurchTemples.com was a helpful resource for locating each temple.

Any

  1. January 21st, 2007 at 14:41 | #1

    Nice graphic, John. Wow, a temple in North Dakota … who knew? If leaders can just get around to putting up a couple of temples up in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut, we can cover the whole map.

  2. Geoff B [Member]
    January 21st, 2007 at 15:40 | #2

    We’re still four hours from a temple in Miami (six hours on a Friday night). :(

    I know, I know, just a few years ago the closest temple was Washington DC (two day drive) and then it was Atlanta (12 hours away). We should count our blessings.

  3. Romney [Visitor]
    January 21st, 2007 at 16:23 | #3

    I believe Vancouver, British Columbia was recently announced, filling in that area.

  4. Brian D. [Member]
    January 21st, 2007 at 18:18 | #4

    We’ll lobby the 1st Pres. On your behalf, Geoff!

    Nice graphic! I’d love to see how the coverage looks globally.

  5. John Mansfield [Member]
    January 22nd, 2007 at 07:04 | #5

    Dave, I had similar thoughts on seeing how the map turned out: When does Yellowknife get a temple?
    Geoff, which do you think will get a temple first, Miami or Havana? After Castro dies and the embargo is lifted, …? One concept I hoped to explore with this map is the shift in mindset such that four or six hours travel to a temple now seems far.
    Brian D., if someone can point me to ESRI shapefile geographic data, and if there is interest in seeing it, I would consider drawing similiar maps for other parts of the globe.

  6. January 22nd, 2007 at 07:24 | #6

    It might be interesting to change your criteria from distance in miles, to distance in travel time, which is probably more relevant to the lives of members.

    The point is, as you probably realize, that how long it takes to get to the temple changes as our technology changes. In 1877 traveling 30 miles required a day, while for most of us in the US today, 30 miles takes 1/2 to 1 hour.

    Of course, this is also different in different parts of the world, based on what is widely available to members. In my own experience, the switch from the plan to build a suburban temple in Harrison, New York, to an urban temple in Manhattan, made a significant difference for inner-city members — who can now travel by subway to the temple (usually 1 hour or less) instead of using a more expensive combination of subway or bus, commuter rail and then taxi, which could take 3 hours or more.

  7. Left Field [Visitor]
    January 23rd, 2007 at 08:16 | #7

    Is there a way to pause or slow it down? As soon as I see something interesting that I want to study more closely, it moves on to the next frame.

  8. queuno [Visitor]
    January 23rd, 2007 at 08:39 | #8

    Control-PrSc as soon as you want to study it, then paste into mspaint.

  9. John Mansfield [Member]
    January 23rd, 2007 at 09:14 | #9

    Left Field, on a Windows or MacIntosh machine, use the Apple QuickTime Player. First, save the figure onto your machine; under Windows, put the mouse cursor over the figure, click the right mouse button, and select “Save Picture As …”. I also tried using the Windows Media Player; it sort of works, but not very well.

  10. Adam Greenwood [Visitor]
    September 26th, 2007 at 12:24 | #10

    Great.

  1. No trackbacks yet.